prochoice-or-gtfo:

Hey, prolifers? Wanna live up to your name? Work so that shit like this doesn’t happen. It’s things like this that prompt pregnant people to abort. Loss of job can be absolutely devastating to one’s life, especially if they already have dependents.
-V

pro-choice-or-no-voice:

bedsider:

Really? Yes. Some students really do believe that yellow skittles can be used as birth control.

That’s a very good reason why we need sex ed. BTW, skittles are not contraception, but here’s everything that is.

Fascinated/concerned by this? Want to see more? Check out 17 Teachers On Their Students’ Weirdest Misconceptions About Sex over at Buzzfeed. 

And people still want us to teach abstinence-only sex education in our schools… - Paige

noir-pourtoujours:

Religious freedom doesn’t mean you get to force others to live by your beliefs

noir-pourtoujours:

Religious freedom doesn’t mean you get to force others to live by your beliefs

hanabridge:

firstgingerdoctor:

mother. friggin’. space. man.
x

rampant-noodle:

with-the-dawn:

lolathelost:

Someone just pointed out to me how Anne Frank and Martin Luther King JR. were both born in the same year, but most people associate them as being in complete different points in history.

This blew my mind

holy fucking shit

montopher:

Noooooooo
No no no
HOW DO PEOPLE BELIEVE THINGS LIKE THIS
people like this is what’s wrong with the world

montopher:

Noooooooo
No no no
HOW DO PEOPLE BELIEVE THINGS LIKE THIS
people like this is what’s wrong with the world

corporateaccount:

i like this

corporateaccount:

i like this

ultrafacts:

The name of the judge was Deborah Servitto, and this is the actual court ruling.



Mr. Bailey complains that his rep is trash
So he’s seeking compensation in the form of cash.
Bailey thinks he’s entitled to some monetary gain
Because Eminem used his name in vain.
Eminem says Bailey used to throw him around
Beat him up in the john, shoved his face in the ground.
Eminem contends that his rap is protected
By the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Eminem maintains that the story is true
And that Bailey beat him black and blue.
In the alternative he states that the story is phony
And a reasonable person would think it’s baloney.
The court must always balance the rights
Of a defendant and one placed in a false light.
If the plaintiff presents no question of fact
To dismiss is the only acceptable act.
If the language used is anything but pleasin’
It must be highly objectionable to a person of reason.
Even if objectionable and causing offense
Self-help is the first line of defense.
Yet when Bailey actually spoke to the press
What do you think he didn’t address?
Those false-light charges that so disturbed
Prompted from Bailey not a single word.
So highly objectionable, it could not be
Bailey was happy to hear his name on a CD.
Bailey also admitted he was a bully in youth
Which makes what Marshall said substantial truth.
This doctrine is a defense well known
And renders Bailey’s case substantially blown.
The lyrics are stories no one would take as fact
They’re an exaggeration of a childish act.
Any reasonable person could clearly see
That the lyrics could only be hyperbole.
It is therefore this court’s ultimate position
That Eminem is entitled to summary disposition.

Source
Follow Ultrafacts for more facts!

ultrafacts:

The name of the judge was Deborah Servitto, and this is the actual court ruling.

Mr. Bailey complains that his rep is trash

So he’s seeking compensation in the form of cash.

Bailey thinks he’s entitled to some monetary gain

Because Eminem used his name in vain.

Eminem says Bailey used to throw him around

Beat him up in the john, shoved his face in the ground.

Eminem contends that his rap is protected

By the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.

Eminem maintains that the story is true

And that Bailey beat him black and blue.

In the alternative he states that the story is phony

And a reasonable person would think it’s baloney.

The court must always balance the rights

Of a defendant and one placed in a false light.

If the plaintiff presents no question of fact

To dismiss is the only acceptable act.

If the language used is anything but pleasin’

It must be highly objectionable to a person of reason.

Even if objectionable and causing offense

Self-help is the first line of defense.

Yet when Bailey actually spoke to the press

What do you think he didn’t address?

Those false-light charges that so disturbed

Prompted from Bailey not a single word.

So highly objectionable, it could not be

Bailey was happy to hear his name on a CD.

Bailey also admitted he was a bully in youth

Which makes what Marshall said substantial truth.

This doctrine is a defense well known

And renders Bailey’s case substantially blown.

The lyrics are stories no one would take as fact

They’re an exaggeration of a childish act.

Any reasonable person could clearly see

That the lyrics could only be hyperbole.

It is therefore this court’s ultimate position

That Eminem is entitled to summary disposition.

Source

Follow Ultrafacts for more facts!

irl-rarity:

Kitty with a heart!!!

irl-rarity:

Kitty with a heart!!!

sloppy:

the deepest post on this site

sloppy:

the deepest post on this site